I thought it was a great premise, and for the first 2/3's of it, I couldn't put it down. Then it crashed and burned. Felt the ending was a cop-out.
WARNING: Spoiler Alert! (but you may thank me)
I dove into this novel thinking, "What a wonderful sci-fi premise," but by the end, I was angry at the author for having mislead me.
If I could speak directly to the author, I say, "Artistic license is fine for a reporter, but when it comes to fiction, revealing that the coincidence engine never really existed is tantamount to saying: it was all a dream."
Anyone who's studied writing knows that one of the big rules is: don't tell your reader at the end of the story that it was all a dream. Saying the central premise of the story never existed is just as bad if not worse. What that's telling the reader is that the author was just too lazy to give the story an internal logic or was just not up to making that internal logic work to its rightful conclusion.
All the way through the story, the reader is lead to believe there's a coincidence engine. Further, the reader is given lots of opportunities to guess what that engine is and how it works.
And, BTW, saying at the end that the whole thing was orchestrated by a senior member of a government agency just doesn't work. There were too many coincidences that aren't explained by that 'explanation.'
I agree with some of the other comments about the characters in this story. Wonderfully realized and fun to follow. But another big mistake the author made was to kill off all the really nasty antagonists before the story's climax.
Anyway, I've had my rant and perhaps I've saved someone else from expecting more than this novel delivers.
Very clever premise, about a secret organization hunting down a mysterious machine that may or may not be able to alter probability (shades of the Scarlet Witch! - inside joke). There are several amusing moments, some pretty entertainingly quirky characters, and a satisfyingly bizarre conclusion. It's a pretty quick read and fun, but something kept it form fully working for me. I think I wanted more. Still, entirely enjoyable. 1/18/12
Very enjoyable two day read. A sort of Hitchhiker's Guide meets John LeCarre.
"Our job is to assess threats to national security that we don’t know exist, using methods that we don’t know work. This produces results that we generally can’t recognize as results, and when we can recognize them as results, we don’t know how to interpret them." – Red Queen.
Exciting, hilarious, thought provoking.
There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.